Coordinated Bombings in Iraq foretells Afghanistan’s Fate

The coordinated bombings across Iraq this week are the logical result of the drawing down of foreign combat forces in that country. Afghanistan is operating on a different time line, but the end result will be the same.

In this writers opinion many of the policy decisions leading to the long term occupation of Afghanistan have been driven by a desire to corner Iran strategically, and to secure the Turkmenistan and Pakistan borders ensuring that proposed natural gas pipelines from the Caspian sea pass through countries sympathetic to the United States and friends. At some point in the future, foreign governments will make policy decisions based on the fact that the costs in materiel, manpower and treasure will begin to outweigh these future unrealised benefits.

When this moment comes, and combat troops are drawn down in Afghanistan, Obama, or his successor will declare ‘Mission Accomplished’. Just as in Iraq, this will be the starters pistol for any Afghan anti-government forces to begin a wave of bombings across the country.

As in Iraq, events will show as false the premise that combat operations will be determined by the ‘facts on the ground’ and that they would only finish when Iraqi/Afghan forces were equipped and capable of maintaining security on their own. Afghanistan can look forward to the same scenario playing out when it is decided in far away places that the training wheels need to come off…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Save Net Neutrality

Google and Verizon are suggesting that existing commitments to net neutrality are maintained over wired internet connections, but that these same rules should not apply to wireless traffic. Why the distinction?

WireLESS will be a taking a bigger and bigger share of the overall internet traffic pie in the coming decades. As more and more devices become wifi enabled and truly mobile, the amount of data they throw back and forth between the phone networks will grow accordingly.

Google has a unique opportunity, as a company that already trades in the flow of data (its core business), to monetize a growing segment of that market. Given their dominant position in search, and their growing position as a leading OS provider to smartphones; will this be a licence to print money? Almost certainly…

This is not in the public interest, and the issue of net neutrality must be free from overbearing corporate interference.

Pay for what you download. We will all suffer collectively if we’re forced to pay to put things onto the internet. The argument of expense is a fallacy, storage costs are continuously decreasing, such that you can store twice the data with no change in budget every 14-18 months.

This is an attempted lock down, a monetization, of future data flow by Google. A permanently dominant position, absorbing any startup with decent technology through stealth (charging them for getting their IP to market) or by hostile takeover.

“Do no evil.”

We’ll see if those at Google treat this as a purely sentimental PR line. For the betterment of the vast majority, I hope the regulatory authorities in all relevant jurisdictions enforce a truly free internet for creators of content.

Posted in Obama, Politics, Technology, Uncategorized | Leave a comment